It’s Not About a Can of Diet Soda: United Airline’s Dismissive and Reductive Response to Islamophobia

1560536_812847692167587_7947844159313778386_nOkay, so. This should be obvious by now, and no one should have to point out that “Hey, this isn’t about a simple can of diet coke, people! This is about a larger issue that actually has violent and lethal consequences for many who are subjected to it!” But apparently, it’s not that obvious, and, let alone the media, even United Airlines is being all “we did try to accommodate her request for a diet soda, but there was some confusion and misunderstanding.” Confusion and misunderstanding my Muslim foot.


Many people on Twitter and Facebook have sworn not to fly United again until they redress this issue and acknowledge the bigotry involved here. (Then again, let’s face it: Most people in America are racist and are probably delighted to hear that “Muslims” won’t be flying United, and so United just might become their primary airline choice.) There’s also the hashtag #UnitedforTahera. But beloved CNN starts its article about the issue with the following statement: “A simple request for an unopened can of Diet Coke on a United Airlines flight left Tahera Ahmad in tears.” That’s right, CNN – a girl started crying because she wasn’t being granted her request for an unopened can of diet soda. What can I say – we women are silly and emotional like this, blowing things out of proportion.

The Daily Dot’s headline reads: “United Airlines faces criticism after Muslim woman is denied an unopened can of soda.”

Now, I understand that legally, people can’t accept what Tahera has gone through and expressed, so I get terms like “alleged” or “she claims,” etc., but this is Islamophobia, and the term Islamophobia should not be in quotes in this conversation. Like, Metro titles its piece on the matter as: “People are boycotting United Airlines following an ‘Islamophobic’ incident.” Huffpost, too, has the word “Islamophobic” in quotes – why?

Islamophobia, “Parking Disputes,” and “Beverage Requests”

United’s response to the ordeal is as follows:

11295730_10152817915587001_3243088081395229456_n
For the emptieth time, this isn’t about diet cokes or beverage requests. This reductiveresponse to Islamophobia is like what we saw with the Chapel Hill execution-style murders when the media refused to see the larger problem and reality – and calling it a “parking dispute”! Nothing but anti-Muslim/anti-Islam bigotry of a white man caused the heinous murders of the Chapel Hill shootings.

Here are some recent cases of Islamophobic violence in the U.S. alone:
a rally right outside of a Phenox mosque where people wore shits with the message “Fu** Islam!” on May 29 (but fortunately, it was countered by Muslim supporters!)
a Houston, TX mosque was set on fire on February 13
the attack on a Muslim family at a Kroger in Deerborn, MI (February 12)
– a whole bunch of articles were written in response to the Islamophobic Chapel Hill murders, including this one
a number of attacks that took place in August 2012
– Wikipedia even has a “Flying while Muslim” entry

For more on Islamophobia, here’s a website run by CAIR (a Muslim-American organization) they call an “Islamophobia monitor.”

So, a brief note to United (and the media):

Stop trivializing a person’s experience with bigotry. What happened with Tahera Ahmad wasn’t about a can of soda. She didn’t cry because she wasn’t served a can of coke the way she wanted it. She was treated unfairly; the flight attendant made her Islamophobia against Tahera very clear by claiming that “unopened cans might be used as a weapon on the plane” (and didn’t say the same to the man next to Tahera who did receive an unopened can of beer from the same flight attendant); the policy invoked by the flight attendant was not put in practice the same way with another passenger because he was visibly not Muslim; and another passenger starting calling out hate comments, and no one (presumably the flight attendants were nearby?) responded to shut him up. Tahera Ahmad was suspected as a potential terrorist–because she is visibly Muslim, at least as her hijab showed–and the word “weapon” was used by the flight attendant for no reason other than to hint to her being a Muslim and thus a potential terrorist. So what happened was actually an expression of hate and prejudice against a Muslim individual who was outwardly “other,” outwardly Muslim. And we all know that Muslims and “Muslim-looking” people make the best targets of hate, which we justify as acceptable because they are terrorists, potential terrorists, relatives of (potential) terrorists, and/or belong to the same skin color and/or religion of some terrorists.

What makes you (United’s) response to the incident unacceptable and wrong is that you pretend the whole case is about a beverage. The correct, more appropriate, more responsible response would have been to first acknowledge that what she went through was unacceptable and you will do everything in your power to correct this in the future — and apologize for what happened – instead of making it seem like she cried over an opened can of coke. (I know, I know – such an admission to prejudice would get you in trouble, and you can’t risk that, but whatever; it’s still irresponsible to deny the hate against a Muslim individual here.) This would not necessarily be required of you if we were not living in a society that is constantly targeting non-white people, a society thriving on racial profiling, a society where Muslim-bashing/Islamophobia is a lucrative business.

Given the reality of Islamophobia, hate, discrimination against people marked as “other” on a daily basis, you owe it to anyone who has been victimized by you to treat them with respect and recognize the harm you have caused them – and others like them, or others for whom living with hate is a reality.

Again, just stating the obvious here that what Tahera Ahmad went through wasn’t about a can of coke. It was and is about the denial of Islamophobia in the U.S., of multiple forms of discrimination against people based on their religion, choice of clothing, skin color, and other markers of difference that need to be celebrated as contributing to diversity.

Advertisements

About Orbala

I want it to rain on my wedding day, pliss.
This entry was posted in I can't believe this needs to be said out loud, Islamophobia and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to It’s Not About a Can of Diet Soda: United Airline’s Dismissive and Reductive Response to Islamophobia

  1. rosalindawijks says:

    It’s terrible how islamophobia has come acceptable & salonfähig. I have seen lots of nasty examples of islamophobia online, on facebook and youtube, and they don’t do anything about it!

    Like

  2. rosalindawijks says:

    Here is a bit of a complaint about Facebooks policy regarding islamophobia.
    These past few days, I have seen some really terrible islamophobic comments in topics in which Muslims and/or Muslim majority countries played a part.
    I’m talking about comments like “we need to nuke those bastards” and “we have to kill those Indonesian monky’s”
    I reported all those comments to Facebook and what happened? Facebook wrote back to me and said that those comments didn’t violate it’s policies. Now I’m seriously considering turning my back to Facebook forgood.

    Like

    • orbala says:

      Oh wow, that’s painful to read. I’m not surprised – FB said the same thing (“doesn’t violate our policies”) when I along with a whole bunch of ppl reported child pornography too! And some racist & sexist pages. FB has a disturbing team regarding all of this.

      Like

  3. This honestly makes me so mad. The second part of Ahmad’s experience when a man calls a bunch of Islamophobic slurs is even more frightening and the media ignores it. The media always overlooks problems constantly faced by minorities and white society is threatened by just seeing a minority.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. rosalindawijks says:

    Well, it really reveals what those policies & standards are. VERY disturbing!

    The irony is, that there was a satyric page “tattas be like” (= “whiteys/Dutchies be like”) with multicultural jokes about just about any ethnic group. They banned it because it was “discriminatory”.

    So making jokes about white people is discrminatory, but calling for genocide against Muslims and Indonesians isn’t. Disgusting.

    This could also be a good starting point for a new post, on islamophobia on internet. Youtube is also full of islamophobia, racism and sexism.

    Like

  5. snpeterson says:

    Ahmad must have been extremely frightened when that man screamed at her and NO ONE helped. As far as I am concerned; that airline failed in their duty of care to protect her; as is her right as a paying customer. Getting sick of Muslim woman being attacked on any public transportation.

    Like

  6. snpeterson says:

    I don’t know if you saw the news but United Airlines are in the news again; this time a pilot evicted a young girl with autism and her family from the plane. Friendly skies maybe only for White ‘abled’ people perhaps.

    Like

    • orbala says:

      Ya!! I remember reading about that when the Tahera issue was up! That’s really sad. Come to think of it, this world in general seems to be fit most for upper-class white abled people!

      Liked by 1 person

Your turn! You look like someone with a view.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s